Mandarin Oriental International Limited

Basis: IFRS, US$m, fiscal years ending 31 December. FY2021–FY2024 are from audited preliminary announcements and annual reports. For FY2025, only JMH-disclosed figures and MO's results overview are available.

MOIL distinguishes "underlying" performance from "non-trading items." Non-trading items chiefly comprise:

• fair-value changes on One Causeway Bay;

• gains and losses on disposals.

Both bases are shown below.

Income statement

Sources: MOIL Prelim FY2022 (FY2021–22); MOIL Prelim FY2024 (FY2023–24); JMH AR2025 (FY2025 underlying profit, on a 100% MO basis).

The FY2020 comparatives were an underlying loss of US$206m, a loss attributable of US$680m and an EBITDA loss of US$74m (MOIL Prelim FY2021).

Per-share data

Notes on dividends:

• The FY2025 ordinary interim dividend of US¢1.50 is inferred from dividends paid to the JMH parent in 2025 (US$56m ≈ 88% × US¢5.00 × 1,263.8m shares, covering the FY2024 final of US¢3.50 plus the FY2025 interim of US¢1.50). No FY2025 final dividend is disclosed.

• The special dividend of US$0.60 (US$758m) was declared from the proceeds of the One Causeway Bay sale and paid in January 2026 (JMH AR2025).

Margins and growth

All ratios are derived from MOIL figures. The underlying EBITDA margin including associates overstates the true margin, because the numerator includes the share of associate EBITDA while associate revenue is excluded from consolidated revenue.

Revenue CAGR, FY2021–FY2024: 18.4% per year (US$316.9m to US$525.8m). The base is COVID-depressed. On a cleaner FY2022–FY2024 basis, the CAGR is 7.6% per year, despite disposals of Washington D.C. (2022), Jakarta (2023) and Paris (2024).

Balance sheet

Sources: MOIL Prelim FY2022 and FY2024 balance sheets and notes; JMH AR2025.

Notes:

FY2023 net debt: uses cash of US$190.3m, which includes US$11.5m classified as held for sale.

FY2024 net debt: is US$94m in MOIL's own figures; JMH reports US$93m.

FY2025 net cash: of US$856m is the year-end figure, before the US$758m special dividend paid in January 2026. Pro forma net cash after the dividend is about US$98m (derived).

Revaluation reserves: cumulative fair-value losses on the One Causeway Bay site in revenue reserves were US$616.1m (2021), US$720.2m (2022), US$1,207.8m (2023) and US$1,378.8m (2024).

Cash flow

Sources: MOIL cash flow statements. FY2025 dividends paid are derived (the FY2024 final of US$44.2m plus the FY2025 interim of US$19.0m). FCF definitions are derived.

Notes on disposal proceeds:

FY2022: Washington D.C. net proceeds.

FY2023: sale of the Jakarta subsidiary (US$75.6m net cash inflow) plus US$67.2m repayment of associate loans.

FY2024: Paris hotel (US$215.7m) plus Paris retail (US$105.4m net). A further US$54.0m of deferred consideration is receivable within three years.

FY2025: Munich (about €150m reported) and One Causeway Bay (US$925m), both n/d at the cash-flow level.

Ratios

Methodology:

• All ratios are derived from MOIL filings except the "reported" gearing lines.

ROIC: NOPAT is approximated as underlying PBT plus net financing charges less underlying tax.

FY2021 asset turnover: uses year-end assets, because FY2020 total assets are not used here.

Cash conversion cycle: is not meaningful for a hotel operator: inventory is negligible (stocks of US$5.2m in FY2024) and not disclosed in a CCC-relevant form.

Commentary on trends, inflections and drivers

1. Recovery arc, FY2021 to FY2023. Revenue rose 76% from FY2021 to FY2023 and underlying EBITDA more than quadrupled, from US$40.7m to US$177.6m. Travel restrictions lifted in EMEA and the Americas during Q1 2022, and in East Asia only in late 2022 and early 2023.

The FY2023 inflection — underlying profit of US$81m versus US$8m — was driven by the reopening of Hong Kong and Tokyo, historically the Group's two key profit contributors. MO noted that Hong Kong was its most profitable hotel before the pandemic.

2. FY2024 plateau and mix shift. Consolidated revenue fell 5.8% in FY2024, mainly because the Paris hotel was deconsolidated in April 2024. Underlying profit fell 8%, because one-off residence branding fees dropped. Underneath that:

• recurring hotel management fees rose 15%;

• combined total revenue rose 13%;

• RevPAR rose 7%.

The quality of earnings therefore improved even as headline profit dipped.

3. Statutory losses driven by One Causeway Bay. Cumulative revaluation losses on the Causeway Bay site reached US$1,378.8m by FY2024, reflecting Hong Kong Grade A office values in a sharp downcycle. These losses are non-cash. They explain why MOIL reported statutory losses in every year from FY2020 to FY2024 despite underlying profitability from FY2022.

Selling 13 floors for US$925m in Q4 2025 crystallised part of that value. The price was struck in a weak market and to a strategic buyer (Alibaba and Ant).

4. Deleveraging and the balance-sheet transformation. Net debt fell steadily: US$517m (2021), US$376m (2022), US$225m (2023), US$94m (2024), then a net cash position of US$856m (2025, before the special dividend). This came despite about US$284m of cumulative One Causeway Bay capex in FY2021–FY2024. The funding came from disposals of Washington D.C., Jakarta, Paris and Munich, and from recovered operating cash flow.

5. Low returns on capital. Underlying ROE of about 2.6% and ROIC under 3% reflect how heavily the balance sheet was tied up in a non-yielding development asset (about US$2.0bn of investment property under development at YE2024) and in owned hotels carried at depreciated cost. Adjusted NAV per share of US$3.50 versus book NAV of US$2.25 in FY2024 shows that owned hotels are carried well below market value.

6. FY2025. Underlying net profit was US$78m (+4%), helped by higher contributions from Hong Kong and Tokyo (JMH AR2025). Like-for-like RevPAR rose 10% and the Group gained 3 points of market share (MO, 18 March 2026).

7. Early 2026. JMH's Q1 2026 IMS reported weaker performance from MO's owned hotels, partly offset by an improved management business despite the impact of conflict in the Middle East. JMH's H1 2026 results reported a lower MO contribution because of weaker owned-hotel performance, with a stable management business.

Management guidance

MO has issued no numeric guidance, and none is required as a private company.

Qualitative signals:

• MO's FY2025 overview expressed confidence in its strategic direction while acknowledging uncertainty in the Middle East.

• JMH's 2026 group guidance is profit "in line with 2025, adjusted for business disposals."

• JMH's H1 2026 commentary flagged lower MO profit from weaker owned hotels and a stable management business.

Consensus growth expectations: not available (no analyst coverage).

Bull case

1. The fee engine compounds. Recurring management fees grew 15% (FY2024) and 14% (H1 2025). More than 30 signed projects and the goal of more than doubling the portfolio by 2033 point to sustained double-digit fee growth. Fees are high-margin: management EBITDA margin was about 48–56% in FY2023–FY2024.

2. Asset monetisation unlocks NAV. Adjusted NAV of US$3.50 per share sat against book NAV of US$2.25 (FY2024). The Paris (US$382m), Munich and One Causeway Bay (US$925m) disposals show that trophy assets can be sold at strong values while retaining fees. Further sales could fund growth or distributions to JMH.

3. Private ownership removes the listing discount and allows patient investment. With net cash and a sponsor focused on long-term TSR (JMH targets at least 9% per year), MO can invest in renovations — Hong Kong, The Landmark, Bangkok — and in new categories such as the cruise and Exceptional Homes without quarterly pressure.

Bear case

1. Return on capital remains structurally weak. ROE of about 2.6% and ROIC under 3% even at peak recovery (FY2023–FY2024). Owned-hotel results were already softening in H1 2026.

2. Geopolitical exposure is rising. The pipeline is weighted towards the Middle East (Dubai, Riyadh, Jeddah, Muscat, Doha) and Egypt, where conflict hurt Q1 2026 results. Asian profit concentration in Hong Kong and Tokyo persists.

3. Scale disadvantage. Large chains are expanding their luxury brands, backed by loyalty ecosystems, while ultra-luxury independents (Four Seasons, Rosewood, Aman) compete for the same owners. That could compress fee terms or slow signings, and lumpy residence fees add earnings volatility (FY2024 profit fell despite +15% recurring fees).

Key catalysts and monitorables (next 12 months)

Analyst verdict

Mandarin Oriental enters its first year as a private company in materially better shape than at any time since the pandemic.

Transformation since 2021:

• From 2021 to 2025, the Group moved from net debt of US$517m to net cash of US$856m.

• It returned to consistent underlying profitability: US$81m, US$75m and US$78m over FY2023–FY2025.

• It reshaped itself from an owner-led hotelier into a brand-led operator. Management fees are growing in the mid-teens, and system revenue (US$2.1bn) is four times consolidated revenue.

Disposals of Washington D.C., Jakarta, Paris and Munich — all with management contracts retained — together with the US$925m partial sale of One Causeway Bay, demonstrate disciplined capital recycling. The weakness has been converting heritage and trophy assets into competitive returns on capital.

Privatisation logic. Jardine Matheson's US$4.2bn take-private was ultimately a judgment that public markets would not value MO's NAV and growth optionality. The shares traded at roughly 0.6x adjusted NAV before the offer, and JMH can fund the next decade more efficiently as sole owner.

Execution risks. The strategic logic is sound, but three risks stand out:

1. sustaining fee growth while competing for contracts against Four Seasons, Rosewood, Aman and the chains' luxury brands;

2. managing a pipeline increasingly exposed to the Middle East and North Africa amid regional conflict;

3. lifting owned-hotel profitability, which softened in H1 2026.

Verdict: MO is a high-quality brand asset with improving earnings quality but sub-par capital returns. Its value will be realised through fee scaling and further asset monetisation rather than organic owned-hotel growth.

For external stakeholders — owners, lenders and competitors — MO should now be assessed as a well-capitalised, sponsor-backed operator with an asset-light ambition: credible, but still in mid-transition. The most important near-term indicator is whether FY2026 management-business growth can offset owned-hotel and geopolitical headwinds and keep underlying profit around the US$75–80m range achieved over the past three years.

---

Disclaimer: Figures are taken from the public filings cited. Derived ratios are analyst calculations. Items marked "n/d" were not publicly disclosed at the dossier date.