Market Size (2018)
2018
—
Vertical: HealthcareBase Year: 202112 Sections
Market Size (2018)
2018
—
Projected (2030)
2030
—
CAGR (2018–2030)
N/A
Key Players
106+
Tumor ablation is the minimally invasive method to treat solid cancer by the burn and freeze. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computed Tomography (CT), Ultrasound (US) is used to guide and position the needle probe into tumor. The key factors attributing to drive the market growth are increasing prevalence of cancer across the globe and the rising demand for minimally invasive tumor ablation techniques, growing number of public-private initiatives & funding to support ongoing research activities related to tumor ablation. However, the side effects and complications associated with tumor ablation, delay in approval, and unfavorable regulatory policy and reimbursement scenario are a threat to the growth of the market. Furthermore, increasing research and development activity is likely to create market opportunity for the global market leaders.
Tumor Ablation Market is a key focus area for market intelligence and strategic research.
Historical performance and future projections (2020–2030, USD Billion)
Subscribe to Wantstats
Unlock premium reports, insights, blogs, charts and more.
View Subscription PlansSubscribe to Wantstats
Unlock premium reports, insights, blogs, charts and more.
View Subscription PlansThe scope of the global tumor ablation market study includes market size analysis and a detailed analysis of the different products and strategies. The market has been segmented based technology, treatment, application, end user and region.
Subscribe to Wantstats
Unlock premium reports, insights, blogs, charts and more.
View Subscription PlansSubscribe to Wantstats
Unlock premium reports, insights, blogs, charts and more.
View Subscription PlansThis report applies a rigorous multi-stage research process combining primary interviews, secondary data sources, and bottom-up market modelling to ensure accuracy and completeness across all segments and geographies.
Base Year
2021
Historical Period
2018 – 2021
Forecast Period
2021 – 2030
Primary Interviews
150+
Historical data (2018–2021) and forecast period (2021–2030)
Our research process spans primary interviews with industry stakeholders combined with comprehensive secondary data analysis, validated through triangulation across multiple independent sources.
Threat of New Entrants
The threat of new entrants is moderate in the global tumor ablation market. Any player trying to enter the market is required to comply with the mandatory regulatory standards. Moreover, the R&D of products is capital intensive. To remain competitive, market players need to introduce innovative products for various therapeutic applications, which requires significant investments and time. However, the presence of lucrative growth opportunities in the market has increased the threat of new entrants.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
The suppliers in the global tumor ablation market are raw material providers. The raw materials required in tumor ablation product manufacturing include metals, polymers, ceramics, electronic components, and other materials. There are various suppliers present in the market. The switching costs are low due to intense competition, and suppliers are likely to enter into long-term partnerships with product manufacturers. The increasing R&D related to cancer treatment has led to the entry of several suppliers into the market.
However, the quality of raw materials plays an important role as the tumor ablation products are used in several advanced treatments. Low-quality raw materials are likely to damage the quality of the final product. Hence, market players are selective about suppliers. Due to these factors, the bargaining power of suppliers in the global tumor ablation market is low.
Bargaining Power of Buyers
The bargaining power of buyers is moderate in the global tumor ablation market. The market has a moderate number of buyers, and only a few medical device companies cater to the needs of tumor ablation products. However, the tumor ablation products are specialized. The buyers are moderately inclined toward quality products manufactured by trusted companies; hence, they are likely to enter into long-term agreements with product manufacturers for uninterrupted supply. They can also exert pressure on the manufacturers due to moderate switching costs and intense rivalry in the market. Currently, several FDA-approved tumor ablation products are available in the market, and several other products are in clinical trials, which are expected to be commercialized during the forecast period. Introduction of new products in the market can influence positively on bargaining power of buyers by providing more products to choose from.
Threat of Substitutes
The threat of substitutes in the global tumor ablation market is moderate-to-high. Several options are available in the market to cater to the needs of the buyers. Several approaches for treating tumors include surgery, therapies using medication including targeted therapies, immunotherapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and more. However, increasing R&D and the rising demand for safer tumor ablation products are likely to result in the introduction of substitutes during the forecast period.
Intensity of Rivalry
The rivalry in the global tumor ablation market is moderate-to-high. The moderate degree of product differentiation and a moderate number of buyers increase the intensity of rivalry in the market. The market is growing and is projected to register a high growth rate during the review period, which offers opportunities to the key players to expand their regional presence and market share, especially in emerging markets. This, along with a focus on the end-to-end development of products, helps market players reduce manufacturing and logistics costs, thereby increasing profitability and maintaining a high level of competition.
See plans for professionals or small and medium businesses.

Analytical insights on Tumor Ablation Market covering market dynamics, competitive landscape, and strategic outlook.
Tumor Ablation Market represents a significant market opportunity with multiple growth drivers across regions and segments.
The key factors expected to drive the market growth are the increasing prevalence of cancer across the globe and the rising demand for minimally invasive tumor ablation techniques. Moreover, a growing number of public-private initiatives & funding to support ongoing research activities related to tumor ablation further drives the growth of the market. However, the side effects and complications associated with tumor ablation, delay in approval, and unfavorable regulatory policy and reimbursement scenario are likely to hamper the global market growth during the review period.
The growing prevalence of cancer is increasing the demand for effective treatment. The number of patients suffering from various types of cancers such as lung, blood, breast, and liver is increasing worldwide. According to GLOBOCAN 2020 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 19.3 million new cancer cases and about 10 million cancer deaths occurred globally in 2020. According to the American Cancer Society, it is estimated that 1.9 million new cases of cancer were diagnosed, and 608,570 deaths were reported in the US in 2021. Excessive smoking and consumption of alcohol and tobacco are the important factors responsible for the increasing prevalence of cancer across the world. Additionally, obesity is also one of the reasons which may increase the prevalence of cancers, driving the demand for tumor ablation procedures. According to the WHO’s 2021, fact sheet, excessive consumption of tobacco results in 7 million deaths every year. Moreover, lung cancer is the leading cause of death across the globe and accounts for about 37% of cases.
Thus, the growing number of patients suffering from cancer is expected to increase the demand for tumor ablation procedures and fuel the growth of the global market during the forecast period.
The key players in the market are proactively working on R&D for improving and advancing techniques for tumor ablation. For instance, in April 2021, Medtronic plc received Breakthrough Device Designation status from the US FDA for the Emprint ablation catheter kit. This is an investigational device intended to be used in conjunction with the Emprint microwave generator and Medtronic lung navigation platform to provide a minimally invasive, localized treatment of malignant lesions in the lung. It can be used together with standard care therapy when indicated. Likewise, in July 2020, Ethicon, a Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Company, also received the US FDA Breakthrough Device Designation for transbronchial microwave ablation technology using robotic-assisted bronchoscopy. Thus, rising R&D activity in tumor ablation techniques is anticipated to provide significant opportunities for market growth.
Although ablation is a minimally invasive technique and is generally considered safe, there are few possible side effects after ablation therapy, including abdominal pain, infection in the liver, and fever. For instance, side effects of radiofrequency ablation in the facet and sacroiliac joints include burning and/or hypersensitivity and numbness, and/or tingling over the injection site. In addition, there are also several risks associated with the radiofrequency ablation procedure, such as hyperesthesia, superficial skin infections over the injection site, heat damage to structures adjacent to the target nerve, allergic reaction to the anesthetic used to numb the skin, and more. Likewise, several potential complications are associated with irreversible electroporation, such as hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, portal vein thrombosis, injury to bile ducts, and infection. Thus, the side effects and complications associated with tumor ablation are anticipated to restrain the market growth.
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an enormous burden on the healthcare system globally. The clinical services for cancer patients have been significantly affected in several aspects. For instance, the time-critical nature of diagnosis for COVID-19 and the large number of patients requiring hospital admission has diverted resources from healthcare services for patients with a chronic medical illness such as cancer. To accommodate a large number of COVID-19 patients, several prominent institutions and cancer centers have reoriented their clinical activity. Moreover, official recommendations from authorities in several countries had asked to cancel non-urgent clinical activities and elective surgery at the beginning of the pandemic in 2020. They had also requested to reduce out-patient clinic visits. Several centers had also turned their operating theater into intensive care units (ICU) and recruited young oncologists for working in the ICU. Furthermore, several resources allocated to cancer care, such as general anesthesia, nurses, and medical staff, also faced limitations in dealing with the COVID-19 care. Moreover, the closure of many cancer clinics due to the pandemic has led to the postponement or cancellation of patient appointments for cancer diagnostics, resulting in a decrease in new cancer diagnoses and a delay in treatments. Cancer follow-up or imaging appointments have also been delayed in many clinics around the world.
The key manufacturers have reported that market for the medical devices segment has been negatively impacted by COVID-19 and associated deferral of medical procedures in the first half of 2020. In addition, the global regulatory landscape has also been affected as the COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect the US and global economies. To meet the challenges presented by the pandemic, the US FDA and other health authorities have shifted their resources and priorities to deal with the pandemic. These pandemic-related disruptions have led to a slightly negative impact on the processing of regulatory submissions and slow agency review times necessary for the approval or clearance of new devices. Furthermore, some of the medical devices companies have also faced a slight decrease in revenue due to a decline in operating margin and diluted earnings per share. The pandemic has also affected the free cash flow for most companies.
However, the key players in the industry have made effective plans and strategies to cope with the disruptions caused by the COVID-19. They have successfully engaged in mergers & acquisitions to strengthen their product portfolio. The manufacturers have engaged in developing and launching new products related to tumor ablation for the oncology market. For instance,
In June 2021, Boston Scientific Corporation (US) acquired the remaining shares of Farapulse, Inc. (US). The acquisition will complement the existing Boston Scientific electrophysiology portfolio to include the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) System—a non-thermal ablation system for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) and other cardiac arrhythmias.In July 2021, Bioventus Inc. (US) and Misonix, Inc. (US), a provider of minimally invasive therapeutic ultrasonic technologies and regenerative medicine that enhance clinical outcomes, entered a definitive agreement by which Bioventus will acquire Misonix in a cash-and-stock transaction.In July 2020, SonaCare Medical (US) received regulatory approval from the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), formerly known as the China FDA, for the Sonablate HIFU device for use in the treatment of prostate cancer and benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH).
Hence, the key players are engaged in strengthening their portfolio related to tumor ablation for the oncology market.
Clinical trials are used for establishing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, determining the baseline parameters, monitoring the safety of the participants, and demonstrating the efficacy of the investigational product. A group of 36 investigators conducting clinical trials for cancer at institutions around the world between March and April 2020 was surveyed by the Cancer Research Institute (CRI). According to their findings, in the US and several countries in Europe, patient enrolment in active oncology clinical trials had reduced significantly at the time of the survey. In Europe, only 14% of the institutions continued to enroll patients at the usual rate. Over 200 interventional oncology studies were suspended, and 60% of investigators reported that the pandemic had a severe impact on clinical trials.
Furthermore, Clinical SCORE surveyed 363 clinical trial sites across a range of settings, provider specialties, and countries in April 2020. Around 36% of sites awaiting trial activation reported that the sponsors had postponed starting recruitment and enrollment, while 48% of sites were actively enrolling and randomizing patients saying they could not get patients to come for a visit. Research-dedicated sites and those with more than ten trials appear to be the most receptive to virtual visits. The percentage of enrolling sites experiencing substantial delays ranged from 54% to 61%.
Thus, the COVID-19 outbreak has affected clinical trials, and observational studies across the globe as major companies and institutes are facing issues in recruiting volunteers for the study. Additionally, the delay faced owing to the lack of staff is negatively affecting the clinical trials.
The pandemic has changed the business environment for numerous organizations across the globe. The supply chain is the key to fulfill customer demands. Several countries have implemented certain restrictions on imports and exports because of the pandemic in the first half of 2020. This has also affected the healthcare industry as many countries are dependent on other countries for raw material supply, component supply, system supply, and technology. The major players operating in the market are Johnson & Johnson (US), Medtronic plc (Ireland), and Boston Scientific Corporation (US). These players have their production facility distributed across the globe, including North America, Europe, Asia, and the Rest of the World. The lockdown and restrictions due to COVID-19 globally have resulted in a slight negative impact on the supply chain of tumor ablation products in the first half of 2020, however, the sales of tumor ablation products increased in the second half of 2020.
Profiles of 106 companies operating in the Tumor Ablation Market market, including revenue, employee count, and market positioning where available.
Showing 106 of 106 companies
AngioDynamics
Company Headquarters: New York, US Founded: 1988 Workforce: ~1,200 Company Working: AngioDynamics manufactures disruptive and innovative medical devices. The company provides vital tools to healthcare professionals around the world. It reaches over 50 markets via direct sales and distributors. It sells and markets its products to interventional radiologists, interventional cardiologists, vascular surgeons, urologists, interventional and surgical oncologists, and critical care nurses directly, as well as through distributor relationships. AngioDynamics has operating facilities in Europe, the US, Asia, and Latin America.
EDAP TMS
Company Headquarters: Vaulx-en-Velin, France Founded: 1979 Workforce: ~ 500 Company Working: EDAP TMS is a pioneer and a market leader in Extracorporeal ShockWave Lithotripsy (ESWL) with the Sonolith range of devices. Its products are marketed through a network of subsidiaries and distribution partners around the globe. It is investing in R&D heavily to maintain and strengthen its level of innovation and research. It also offers three HIFU products such as the Ablatherm, Ablatherm Fusion, and Focal One. Products including lasers, micro-ultrasound equipment, and other medical supplies are sold by its distribution division to support its international activities. The company has operations in France, the US, and other regions.
Sonablate
Company Headquarters: North Carolina, US Founded: 2004 Workforce: ~117 Company Working: Sonablate designs and manufactures HIFU surgical ablation systems that offer physicians and patients both clinical effectiveness and quality-of-life interventions. It also offers laparoscopic invasive hhigh-intensityfocused ultrasound (HIFU) surgical ablation system, fully integrated multi-transducer technology, and ultrasound-based imaging and assessment technology. The company is a leader in the development and advancement of minimally invasive HIFU technology. It is a global leader in HIFU therapies, with over 15,000 patient procedures completed and regulatory clearance in over 50 countries around the globe.
Biotronik
Company Headquarters: Berlin, Germany Founded: 1963 Workforce: ~9,000 Company Working: Biotronik is a leading global medical device company with products and services that improve and save the lives of patients suffering from endovascular and cardiovascular diseases. The company’s technologies enable physicians around the world to provide patients the highest standard of care. Its medical devices are created by engineers and designers in Germany, the US, Switzerland, and Singapore. The company is a Golden Goose in the US because of its medium to strong market share, strong profit margins, and slower revenue growth than some of its competitors in the Medical Device Manufacturing industry, where it accounts for an estimated 0.5% of total industry revenue. The company research, develops, and manufactures in technologically advanced countries, including Germany, Switzerland, the US, and Singapore.
Boston Scientific Corporation
Company Headquarters: Massachusetts, US Founded: 1979 Workforce: ~36,000 Company Working: Boston Scientific Corporation is a worldwide developer, manufacturer, and marketer of medical devices used in a range of interventional medical specialties. The company collaborates with healthcare professionals to develop a broad portfolio of meaningful innovations that improve outcomes, reduce costs, and increase efficiencies. Its product portfolio is majorly divided into endoscopy, interventional cardiology, neuromodulation, peripheral interventions, rhythm management, and urology & pelvic health. In addition, Boston Scientific serves hospitals, clinics, outpatient facilities and medical offices across the world. Boston Scientific Corporation's manufacturing facilities are located across Malaysia, the US, and Ireland. Apart from this, it has a presence in countries like Japan, the Netherlands, France, Poland, India, China, Turkey, South Africa, and Singapore.
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc.
Company Headquarters: New Jersey, US Founded: 1886 Workforce: ~130,000 Company Working: Ethicon, Inc. is a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson. It was incorporated as a separate company under the Johnson & Johnson umbrella in 1949 to expand and diversify the Johnson & Johnson product line. Ethicon has manufactured surgical sutures and wound closure devices since 1887. Ethicon manufactures sutures, endocutters, breast care products, and energy-based products, like hand instruments, for tissue dissection. In 2016, Ethicon acquired NeuWave Medical, Inc.Johnson & Johnson is the world’s largest and broadly based healthcare company. It engages in the R&D, manufacture, and sale of products in the healthcare field. I Its pharmaceutical segment is focused on six therapeutic areas, including immunology, infectious diseases, oncology, cardiovascular and metabolism, and pulmonary hypertension t has more than 130 years of industry experience. The company has a team of 134,000 people at 260 companies in more than 60 countries around the globe.
Powering the world's best teams.
From next-gen startups to established enterprises.
Trusted by forward-thinking businesses
for data-driven intelligence
Tumor Ablation Market